🔗 Share this article

Tehran is ready to reinitiate nuclear discussions with Washington as long as it is approached with "dignity" and "respect", Tehran's top diplomat has stated.

The Iranian diplomat said exclusively dialogue was effective, and shared new appeals had come from intermediaries to reopen discussions with the Trump administration. He said Iran had zero unreported enrichment locations, and Iran could not yet allow the UN nuclear inspectorate to inspect struck enrichment centers for security reasons.

Navigating a Challenging Route

The foreign minister is walking a difficult course since Iran does not want appear to be operating from a stance of disadvantage, and he emphatically stated that Iran had emerged more powerful defensively and mentally from the coordinated strike on its atomic facilities in June.

He was addressing at a strategic meeting in Tehran where he reaffirmed that Iran had "a fundamental entitlement to enrich uranium domestically that it will always maintain" – the primary cause of the stalemate in the previous talks.

Earlier Negotiations Abruptly Terminated

The prior phases of discussions between the US and Iran were brought to an abrupt and hostile end on 12 June when Israel, with Washington's assistance, targeted Tehran's atomic facilities in a 12-day war that ended with the American leader declaring the facilities had been eliminated. Afterward, Western states used their authority to restore global restrictions, but Iran insists they have not had a major impact.

Perfect Agreement Proposed

Iranian officials claimed they felt they had reached a "perfect agreement" to the enrichment issue in previous talks, when it was decided an Iran-based consortium with American involvement could refine atomic fuel. The two nations would have been able to declare success since domestic enrichment would have continued and the US could be certain that Iran's nuclear programme was entirely non-military.

It had not been settled in the talks that Washington's technical specialists could operate within Iranian territory, but that was a reasonable assumption of the cooperative offer. Diplomats claimed three times they had secured an understanding with Trump's special envoy the US official only for the agreement to fall apart due to "opponents in the US".

Existing Situation

Tehran representatives said the partnership proposal was now off the table, but it seems quite possible the offer could be revived in some form if discussions reopen.

The American leader last week said he had been receiving messages that Iran sought to resume discussions, but in private Tehran representatives claim they are not yet obtaining clear proposals from Washington either directly or from key regional mediators, such as the Qatari government, the Egyptian leadership, Oman and Saudi Arabia. The Tehran's diplomatic corps has been accused of passivity in the aftermath of Trump's direct instinctive approach, but Tehran states negotiations is not part of a show.

Political Standpoint

In his remarks to the forum, intended to depict the US as a controlling nation that exploits the idea of global regulations, Araghchi stated the two-week conflict revealed the conflict could not be ended by armed force. He said the assaults started with a American requirement for an total Iran submission and ended with an absolute demand for a ceasefire.

Iran is convinced the opening assaults from Tel Aviv were mounted with full US knowledge and collaboration, making faith hard to rebuild.

Dialogue Remains the Final Resolution

Araghchi said: "Tehran was not the one that had abandoned dialogue; it was America and the Western nations that had always tried to enforce their demands during the discussions. Dialogue can still be active and remains the ultimate resolution to address disputes, but its standards, rules and fundamentals must be adhered to."

"If they talk to the nation of Iran with the language of dignity and respect, they will obtain a reply in the identical language."

Restoration and Rebuilding

In what is described by Iranian officials as the conflict of repair and reconstruction, the foreign minister stated he was confident Iran's military capacities "have significantly improved than prior to 13 or 14 June of this year. Our entire military infrastructure have been rebuilt. We learned many lessons from this conflict; we have come to know our personal limitations and the shortcomings of the adversary."

He added: "We managed to survive this conflict. Our nuclear technology, which they aimed to destroy, stays intact. The facilities and machinery, if eliminated, will be reconstructed; what is important is the will of the Iranian people and then the unity of the country that they sought to undermine, but were unable to break. The Iranian people have become more resilient, more united, and more backing of the leadership and the state in the wake of this invasion."